Trained runners gain durability, not VO2max

Medium confidence

In already-trained runners, added training volume is tolerated mainly through peripheral and durability adaptation — muscle oxidative capacity, connective-tissue tolerance, and fatigue resistance — rather than through large gains in VO2max.

In plain English

If you already have a running base, a bigger week won't move your top-end fitness much — that engine is mostly built. What changes is durability: your muscles, tendons, and legs get better at holding up to the extra load. For you, base building is about the frame, not the engine.

Why it works

Trained runners sit near their central (VO2max) ceiling, so added volume drives peripheral adaptation — muscle oxidative capacity, capillarization, tendon tolerance — and fatigue resistance rather than large central change.

What it means in practice

Drives the base-building 'established/high spine' (structure-led from week one). Tells the runner ramping 25 to 35 miles that their story is volume tolerance and durability, not 'remembering how to run.'

The evidence

Why we call confidence medium

Supported by peripheral-versus-central evidence (Jones 2017: +48% muscle oxygen use, 0% central change) and content-versus-capacity findings (Zoladz), plus an n-of-1 volume-increase case (Santos) and the resilience literature (Jones 2025, which links higher volume and long runs to durability distinct from VO2max). The evidence is thin — one cohort, one review, one case study — and the resilience link is adjacent rather than a direct volume-tolerance result, so confidence is medium.

Where it applies

Already-trained and well-trained adult runners increasing volume from an existing base.

Does not apply to: beginners and returning runners building from a low base (their gains are more central).

Last reviewed Jun 29, 2026. See how we score.