Quicker steps ease the impact on your joints
High confidence
Cadence is how many steps you take per minute. Bump it up 5 to 10 percent at the same speed, and each footfall lands softer. Peak impact drops about 5 to 10 percent, and the sharp spike at first contact drops even more. Your knees and hips get a little relief, and it costs no extra energy.
Why it works
More steps mean a shorter stride. Your foot lands closer to your body's center of mass — the point you balance around — so it brakes less. Impact peaks lower, and force builds more gradually.
What it means in practice
If knee, shin, or hip pain shows up when you run, a 5-10% cadence bump set by a metronome or audio cue is worth trying. If you run pain-free, it's optional. There's no strong evidence that raising cadence helps runners who already feel comfortable.
The evidence
-
Across all 10 studies, raising stride rate (and shortening stride length to match at constant speed) lowered several biomechanical factors linked to running injury: center-of-mass vertical excursion, ground reaction force magnitude, shock attenuation demand, and energy absorbed at the hip, knee, and ankle. That direction held despite differences in study methods, from overground versus treadmill testing to self-selected versus fixed speeds. The review measures loading, not injury, so it shows that a higher cadence reduces these mechanical factors associated with injury, not that it prevents injury.
-
Raising cadence 5-10% consistently improved biomechanics across the reviewed studies: lower vertical ground reaction forces, reduced loading rates, shorter stride length, better knee and hip alignment, and a more favorable joint loading distribution. An 8-week 10% intervention (Allen 2016) shifted most runners from rearfoot to midfoot or forefoot strike and cut initial impact forces. These changes tracked with fewer overuse injuries, chiefly patellofemoral pain, tibial stress fractures, and medial tibial stress syndrome. The review calls cadence modification a viable option for both prevention and rehabilitation, but cautions that changing biomechanics does not guarantee fewer injuries.
-
Both gait retraining programs cut running pain more than no intervention at 6 months (impact vs control: -3.2 NRS, 95% CI -5.1 to -1.3, p=0.001; cadence vs control: -2.9 NRS, p=0.002). The impact group also improved knee function right after the 2-week program (+10.8, 95% CI 1.0-20.6, p=0.027). Usual pain and lower-limb kinematics did not differ between groups, so the mechanism stays unclear. The trial is small (n=30) with no blinding described.
n=30
-
At a fixed 12 km/h, raising cadence 10% (C1) cut rearfoot peak force by 81 N and shortened stride by 17 cm; orthoses alone (C2) reduced rearfoot peak force by 41 N without changing stride. Low-drop shoes (C3) dropped rearfoot peak force by 72 N and rearfoot contact time by 1.89 ms, shifting pressure toward the midfoot. Combining all three (C4) drove the largest changes: rearfoot peak force fell 183 N, forefoot peak force fell 139 N, and midfoot contact time rose 5.07 ms. All force changes reached p<0.001, with Cohen's d from 0.45 (C2 rearfoot contact time) to 1.21 (C4 forefoot peak force); this single acute treadmill session in 23 runners maps force redistribution, not injury or training outcomes.
n=23
Why we call confidence high
Four lines of evidence point the same way. Schubert's 2014 review, Figueiredo's 2025 systematic review of 18 studies, Junior's 2024 randomized trial in runners with patellofemoral (kneecap) pain, and Nicolas-Peyrot 2025 all converge. A 5-10% cadence increase consistently lowers vertical ground reaction forces, loading rates, and stride length.
Where it applies
Adult recreational and trained runners, especially anyone with current or prior running-related knee or shin pain.
Does not apply to: runners without symptoms whose current cadence already exceeds 175-180 spm at typical training paces.
Last reviewed Apr 30, 2026. See how we score.