Strength training reduces injury risk

Strength training reduces sport-injury risk substantially, with stronger effects than stretching or proprioceptive training alone.

In plain English

A review of 25 trials found that strength training cut injuries to about a third of what untrained groups had. The more consistently athletes lifted, the better it worked.

Why it works

Increased muscle force production, tendon stiffness, joint stability, and movement-pattern quality. Reduced peak loading on individual tissues at a given workload.

What it means in practice

Recommend strength training as a primary injury-prevention strategy. Keep the dose meaningful (2 sessions per week, with progressive loading) — light or sporadic strength work has weaker effect. In running-specific contexts, see the supervised-vs-unsupervised claim for additional nuance.

The evidence

Why we call confidence high

Lauersen 2013 meta-analysis of 25 trials found strength training reduced overall sport-injury risk to about one-third of controls, with overuse injuries cut roughly in half. Lauersen 2018 (not in current corpus) extends with dose-response. Direction is robust across populations.

Where it applies

Adult athletes across sports including team sports, track & field, and runners. Evidence is strongest for team sports; running-specific evidence is more mixed (see counter-studies).

Does not apply to: acute-injury rehab without progressive loading.

Plans that respect this

Last reviewed 2026-05-01. See how we score.