Strength training lowers injury risk

High confidence

Reviews of controlled trials found that strength training cut injuries to about a third of what groups without it saw. In one, every 10% more strength training lowered injury risk by more than 4 percentage points.

Why it works

Stronger muscles, stiffer tendons and steadier joints are thought to lower the peak load any single tissue takes at a given workload. The trials measured injuries, not this mechanism.

What it means in practice

Treat strength training as a first-line way to prevent injury, not an extra. The dose matters: in pooled trials, more strength-training volume meant lower injury risk, so light or sporadic lifting likely does much less. For running specifically, the supervised-vs-unsupervised claim adds important nuance.

The evidence

Why we call confidence high

Lauersen 2013 pooled 25 trials and found strength training cut sport-injury risk to about a third of controls (RR 0.32), while stretching had no effect (RR 0.96) and proprioceptive training a smaller one (RR 0.55); that comparison is across trials, not head to head. Lauersen 2018 pooled 6 strength-training RCTs (7,738 athletes aged 12-40) and found the same size of effect (RR 0.34) with high strength of evidence, and risk fell further as training volume rose. Brunner 2018 adds that strength and balance are the key parts of multicomponent programmes in team sports. In runners specifically the evidence is mixed (see the counter-studies).

Where it applies

Athletes aged roughly 12-40 across sports, including adolescents in some trials. The evidence is strongest for team sports. For running specifically it's more mixed (see the counter-studies).

Does not apply to: acute-injury rehab without progressive loading.

Plans that respect this

Last reviewed Oct 14, 2026. See how we score.